There are a number of reasons why law firms in Oklahoma would want to hire a private investigator.

The most common reason is that most law firms do not have the time to conduct thorough investigations, in addition to preparing the case and the client for court.

Here are 9 reasons for your law firm may need PI services:family_law_attorney_divorce_attorney_investigator_detective_san_francisco_no_fault_divorce_california

1. Surveillance

Most trial attorneys need PIs to conduct some surveillance on an opposing party.

They will use multiple methods of surveillance, coupling modern methods with traditional methods.

Social media also enables investigators to build a picture of a suspect or victim. It also helps to track people’s posts and comments.

PIs have a vast experience in different situations. They know the best type of surveillance to use in different situations.

They can use manned surveillance, trace missing persons and mine data.

2. Background checks

Private investigators perform background checks of individuals for law firms.

They will search public records, verify reference checks and facts, and conduct interviews to provide a detailed profile of someone.

The attorney needs to know their client’s background so that the opposing party will not use information unknown to the lawyer against them.

A background check will also come in handy when the attorney is selecting witnesses.

They want to select a viable witness who does not have something in the past that could make his testimony questionable.

3. Find Witness

A PI works on a list of potential witnesses.

The law firm needs to provide the PI with a full case file, for instance, police statements and reports, sketches, and crime scene photos.

A PI will help the attorney to interview the witnesses identified by the police, even those who refuse to give information. This is because a PI has been trained to be very persuasive.


The PI will deconstruct witness statements, and compare and contrast the statements that were taken at various times.

They can identify flaws and potential areas of exploitation.

Better still, a PI will conduct a thorough search for witnesses that the prosecution is not able to find, and even those the prosecution would not like them to find.

An experienced PI will look for witnesses that could unearth crucial information that the attorney can use to win the case.

The PI can testify in court as an expert witness.

As an expert witness, they can inform the judge or jury about specific aspects of a specialized field.

This way, the aspects can be applied to a case.

4. People Finder

PI services for law firms can be used as a people finder.

A PI may help a law firm to find a witness to testify in a court case, or may need to find someone so as to take a statement from them.

Sometimes a PI may be useful in finding a client whose case has dragged on for years.

The attorney may need them in order to close the case.

The PI needs to locate the litigant, notify them of the outcome and complete any paperwork that may be needed.

Sometimes, the PI may help the plaintiff to locate a defendant so as to have he or she served.

5. Process service

PI services for law firms include process service.

A PI will be useful for process service where people do not want to be served legal documents.

A PI can use surveillance to find the person or use skip tracing to find them if they have left the town or country.

A PI is able to draw from a network of other PIs in other parts of the country or even the world to find someone so as to serve them papers.

A PI will be aware of the laws that need to be observed when serving papers.

For instance, in some states, the papers need to touch the body of the person being served.

In other states, one cannot be served papers on their own property.

A PI is also able to provide adequate evidence that the legal papers were served, for instance an affidavit.

6. Litigation Support

A PI will provide the necessary litigation support.

For instance, they can help in asset location if an attorney intends to file a lawsuit or needs to locate them for attachment.

They will help to locate intellectual property, real and personal property and corporate interests.

If the attorney has obtained a judgment, a PI will help to locate bank and brokerage account records.

7. Supporting services

A PI provides essential supporting services, for instance:

– He helps the advocate to predict the moves of the opposing side

A PI helps in performing background investigations on the opposing side.

This provides crucial information that the attorney can use to predict their next move and win the case.

The information could also reveal how they react to pressure, making it easier for the advocate to cross-examine them or create a favorable negotiation.

Better still, the advocate can become successful in coming up with a winning strategy.

– Gathering evidence

A PI is able to trace evidence that was deleted or hidden, including emails.

They can be used to influence the overall outcome of the case.

– Reconstructing history

A PI can reconstruct the history of a family or company.

He can put together important facts from different historical phases providing the information the advocate needs.

– Performs background checks on witnesses before they testify in court.

This prevents surprise information that could make the attorney lose the case.

8. Post-judgement recovery

If an attorney wins a case and is awarded a large monetary judgement, a PI will help to identify assets and ascertain the debtor’s financial status.

A PI will help with GLB compliant bank account searches, tracing recently transferred interests, and locating hidden assets.

9. Workers’ Compensation

If the workers of a particular company file compensation claims, a PI can run a background check to find whether the company has any history of misclassifying employees.

A PI can also gather evidence if they uncover workers’ compensation insurance fraud.


There are indeed a number of reasons why PI services for Law Firms are essential.

Why allow your law firm risk losing cases since they lacked essential evidence or information?